Search for Arbitration Attorneys or Arbitrators

Enter a city and state

Learn about Arbitration

Arbitration Topics

What's New at


About -

When you just can't come to an agreement, court isn't the only answer. Arbitration is an out-of-court means of dispute resolution. When parties have a disagreement, the 'arbitrator' or 'arbiter' is a neutral third-party that reviews the case to determine what action should be taken, and will determine the terms under which the dispute will be settled. The decision of the arbitrator is final, and may be legally binding or non-binding.

If you have a dispute with your employer or over a commercial contract, it is likely that arbitration is mandatory to resolve any issues. Being an easier means than taking anyone to court, arbitration is often required for resolving disputes within a company and is most often used in settling commercial disputes. Does arbitration sound like your solution? Get started today – find the arbitration attorney or arbitrator you need in any specialty, in any state.


Arbitration News

Article Image

The City of Lockport firefighters won their appeal last week when a state appeals court ruled they are entitled to arbitration concerning the reduction of staff. The reduction came when the city’s ambulance service was abolished in the fall of 2014.


The December 2014 decision was upheld unanimously by the State Supreme Court that restricted the City of Lockport from stopping arbitration with the firefighters union. The court did emphasize it was not taking sides concerning whether the city could cut staff and eliminate city ambulances – just that the firefighters could arbitrate over the matters, calling it a “… matter for the arbitrator to resolve.”


The arbitration request was filed by the Lockport Professional Fire Fighters Association before the ambulances were even removed. The minimum number of firefighters per shift would be reduced from nine to seven in an effort to reduce the cost of overtime. Once the ambulance duties were given to Twi Cities Ambulance, personnel levels were cut further to six.


According to the firefighters’ union’s contract, the city needed to staff equipment adequately to ensure safety. It allowed for cutting below nine firefighters per shift since technology had been updated and needs had changed.


The city argued the financial trouble in 2013 and 2014 was relevant and had to be taken into consideration when making cutbacks. The arbitrator will decide once and for all whether or not the city overstepped its boundaries and will determine whether or not staff needs to be reinstated. Both sides will be given the opportunity to present their cases.