Search for Arbitration Attorneys or Arbitrators

Enter a city and state

Learn about Arbitration

Arbitration Topics

What's New at


About -

When you just can't come to an agreement, court isn't the only answer. Arbitration is an out-of-court means of dispute resolution. When parties have a disagreement, the 'arbitrator' or 'arbiter' is a neutral third-party that reviews the case to determine what action should be taken, and will determine the terms under which the dispute will be settled. The decision of the arbitrator is final, and may be legally binding or non-binding.

If you have a dispute with your employer or over a commercial contract, it is likely that arbitration is mandatory to resolve any issues. Being an easier means than taking anyone to court, arbitration is often required for resolving disputes within a company and is most often used in settling commercial disputes. Does arbitration sound like your solution? Get started today – find the arbitration attorney or arbitrator you need in any specialty, in any state.


Arbitration News

Article Image


In a first in the history of “forced arbitration,” food giant General Mills has added legal language to its coupons stating that any recipient of a “benefit” from the company (including coupons valued as low as fifty cents off a General Mills product) automatically waive their right to sue, and must engage in binding arbitration going forward – even over issues that do not directly stem from the product or coupon.


The new arbitration language appears to be in reaction to the growing number of lawsuits against General Mills and other food companies, most commonly over ?deceptive’ packaging practices, including labeling products as being all natural or implying they contain ingredients they don’t actually contain.  In 2012, for example, General Mills settled a lawsuit over the label on its Strawberry Fruit Roll-Ups, which do not, in fact, contain any strawberries, and agreed to remove the word from future packaging.  In March 2014, a California judge refused to dismiss a lawsuit brought against General Mills over the use of the word “natural” on its Nature Valley products despite the fact that they contain processed ingredients and genetically engineered ingredients.  General Mills announced the new arbitration language shortly after this ruling.


How the courts will interpret this broad language remains to be seen.  On the extreme end, a court could decide that simply by visiting the General Mills website, consumers were agreeing to their arbitration terms.  However, this is considered unlikely.  The courts will work through how the new policies apply or don’t apply over the coming years, and General Mills hopes it at least stems the tide of litigation against it.